jason1.methews wrote:
My habbit I don't jump to conclusion without any analysis. I some how got hold of code of Flash version of Yahoo chess protocol, through which its is possible to enter with out capthca and found very interesting code. Through this code yahoo can identiy whether you are using prog or playing by user self.
News flash! Considering you are a truly a programmer who knows what's going on, YtoICS variants have always identified themselves to the server, through various methods.
- The methods it identifies itself is through the user agent string.
- Also, the original protocol was never 100% accurate to the normal client. For example, the standard exit routine is request room exit, receive room exit confirmation, request server exit, receive server termination, terminate connection. What do YtoICS variants do though? They simply send the request server exit only and terminate connection before confirming the termination with the server. - Finally it's really easy to identify the programs through lobby shouts anyways.
jason1.methews wrote:Programmer may decode what this code says but for other people who don't understand coding let me decode this for them. Through this code yahoo identity whether you are a "Normal user" or Yahoo personal, or Yahoo Games moderator or a "Robot". You can get it confirmed from your programmer friends if want. What this signifies is that Yahoo can ban your id once they identify you as a robot and its very simple. This is another risk. Its upto users to if they want this to happen with them.
This is the Yahoo flash 'client' code. It lets the user know whether others privilege levels are. No one is tagged as a robot except Yahoo robots. Everyone that logs in using these programs is considered a "Normal user". You're confusing using these programs being identified as privileged level robot. Anyhow, I already mentioned how Yahoo can know if you're a using a program already in the three points above. They haven't done anything up to this point have they?
By the way, this is your only warning before a final banning. I don't have patience to defend accusatory statements intended to put down other programs not your own. Make sure you know what you're talking about next time. You've thrown fake statements around in the past.